Unbennaeth Prydain

The Monarchy of Britain, known as Unbennaeth Prydain in the native language, holds a unique place in the history, culture, and heritage of the British people. Rooted in the ancient laws, customs, and traditions of the land, it predates the establishment of any other claims to sovereignty in Britain. Unbennaeth Prydain, which translates from British into the ‘One Chief of Britain,’ serves as a testament to the enduring legacy of the British people.

One key aspect that highlights the authenticity of the Monarchy of Britain is the linguistic connection. The word “corona” or “crown” finds its roots in the British language, specifically in the term “coron.” The linguistic evidence proves that the Britons possessed their own distinct coron, or crown, and a paramount sovereign, before others. The British historical accounts, place names, and archaeological findings further support the existence of a longstanding and well documented Monarchy of Britain. 

The banner of the Britons is the red dragon (Y Ddraig Goch). It is the eldest extant banner in the world, and it is symbolic of imperial authority. The standard of the Britons is the golden dragon (Y Ddraig Aur). It is symbolic of the Monarchy of Britain and the British sovereign, called Uthyrpendragon, or Pendragon (See: Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Index, Pendragon). Everything else that is absent these fundamental signs and symbols of British sovereignty and international personality is not British, and is thereby, fraudulent. The Monarchy of Britain represents the true essence of British identity, culture, and heritage. It has been preserved via consistent diplomatic protest by the British people, and that claim has been maintained by Llywelyn Uthyrpendragon of the Britons since he claimed the incorporeal hereditament rights and the British office of leadership. Anything claiming to be British that does not trace its roots back to this authentic monarchy is deemed false according to British standards.  

Under public international law belligerent occupation does not affect the sovereignty of the occupied state. The occupying power is not a successor to the lawful sovereign in the occupied territory, but is a government based on force (Oppenheim, 1942). 

Protests answer this purpose. With sovereigns it is usual to retain the title and arms of a sovereignty or a province, as an evidence that they do not relinquish their claims to it. (Emerich de Vattel, The Law of Nations, Book 2, chapter 11, no. 145)

Where the possession of the territory is accompanied by emphatic protests on the part of the former sovereign, no title by prescription can arise for such title is founded upon the acquiescence of the dispossessed state [or monarchy], and is such circumstances, consent of third states is of little consequence. (Seokwoo Lee, "Continuing Relevance of Traditional Modes of Territorial Acquisition in International Law and a Modest Proposal," Connecticut Journal of International Law, Fall 2000, p. 8 and Charles G. Fenwick, International Law, 4th ed., 1965, p. 351) 

By its reclamations [assertions of their claim], the State or people [a royal house illegally] deprived of its territory proves that it does not intend to abandon it to the Government which took it. The means of interrupting prescription are of diverse character . . . but if it be weak [like a dispossessed royal house], it can restrict itself to formulating a protest. (Paul Fauchille and Henry Bonfils, Traité de Droit International Public, 2013, p. 760) 

". . . Prescription requires . . . the absence of protest on the part of the former possessor [or his legitimate successors]." (Sharon Korman, The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice, 2003, p. 27) Otherwise, it does not work and the dispossessed royal house continues to hold the highest secular right on earth in relationship to its former lands as long as it continues to uphold its rights by the consistent public use of the sovereign title and national arms of that land. In this case, the golden dragon, which is symbolic of the Pendragon and the red dragon which is symbolic of British Imperial authority.  

Llywelyn's family consists his two sons, Tywysog Dorian and Tywysog Gafyn, his wife, Tywysoges Amanda, and her daughter Tywysoges Haf. 

In conclusion, Unbennaeth Prydain, stands as a historical and cultural cornerstone for the British people. Its ancient origins, codified laws, linguistic connections, and symbolic representations all contribute to its significance. By acknowledging and embracing the rich legacy of the Monarchy of Britain, the British people can continue to celebrate their unique heritage and preserve their cultural identity, liberties, and common rights for generations to come.