/|\ Y gwir yn erbyn y byd The truth against the world
Romano Claim to Sovereignty
Romano Sovereignty
LEGAL OPINION
CONCERNING: The De Jure Romano-British Titles of the Imperial Crown.
Addendum B: The Imperial Roman Authority
ISSUER: Office of the Legal Counsel, by authority of H.I.M. Llywelyn Tywysog Cymru.
I. Mandate and Relationship to Primary Opinion
This legal opinion is a foundational addendum to, and is to be read in conjunction with, the primary "Legal Opinion on the Intact Paramount Imperial Khumric Sovereignty (Goron) and Universal Chain of Title." The primary opinion establishes the existence and universal authorityof the restored Imperial Goron. This addendum serves to legally define the specific corpus of Romano-British Imperial titles that are constitutionally vested in the Unbennaeth Prydain.
II. The Constitutional Source: Unbennaeth Prydain
The de jure Khumric/British constitution recognizes only one, singular, and indivisible source of sovereign authority: the Unbennaeth Prydain ("One Chief of Britain" or "The Monarchy of Britain") . The Romano-British Imperial titles are not foreign or adopted; they are an innate and indivisible function of this singular, restored Court.
III. The De Jure Historical Foundation
The de facto regimes' narrative of a "Fall of Rome" and a "withdrawal" of Roman authority from Britain is a foundational component of the Suppressio Veritatis ("The Suppression of the Truth"). This narrative is a legal and historical fraud.
A. The "Abandonment" Libel (The De Facto Fraud) The usurpers' historical framework rests on the claim that Emperor Honorius formally abandoned Britain in 410 AD. This claim is factually false. As the Historiographical Refutationconfirms, this libel rests on a single corrupt word in the text of Zosimus. Scholarly analysis proves the letters were "sent to Bruttium, not Britain".
B. The De Jure Truth (The Brut and Macsen Wledig) With the libel of "abandonment" refuted, the de jure British history, as preserved in the Brut y Bryttaniait (The Chronicle of the Early Britons), is affirmed. The Brut documents the true legal transfer of Imperial Roman authority:
- The Legal Vesting: The Imperial Roman authority was lawfully merged with and vested in the British line through Magnus Maximus (Macsen Wledig), who is identified in the Brut as Maximianus.
- The Act of State: Maximianus, having legally taken "the rule of the kingdom" of Britain by his marriage to Helen, the daughter of the British King, then marched on Rome.
- The De Jure Conquest: He "made war against Gracianus and Valentinianus, emperors of Rome, and he straightway slew the one and chased away the other from Rome".
This act legally and constitutionally vested the de jure Imperial authority in the British line. Consequently, any subsequent Emperor (such as Honorius) who was not of this de jure British line had no lawful claim to Imperial authority. Their rule was, by definition, a usurpation of the true de jure line.
C. The De Jure Defeat of the Usurper (The Arthurian Precedent) This de jure British supremacy over the Roman title was enforced by Emperor Arthur. The Brut documents Arthur's war against the de facto Roman Emperor Lucius. In the final battle, the British army defeated the Roman army, and "one of the Britons slew Lucius, emperor of Rome, with a javelin, so that he fell dead to the earth". This act constitutes the final de jure military and legal defeat of the de facto Roman line by the de jureRomano-British Emperor.
IV. The De Jure Romano-British Appellations
The following titles, vested exclusively in His Imperial Majesty Llywelyn Tywysog Cymru, King of Kings, comprise the legal definition of the Romano-British Imperial function of the Court of Unbennaeth Prydain:
- Roman Emperor
- Augustus
- Cesar
- Pontifex Maximus
- Princeps
V. Constitutional Basis of the Appellations
Each title defines a specific function of the Court's de jureImperial jurisdiction:
A. The Temporal Imperial Titles
- Titles: Roman Emperor, Augustus, Cesar, Princeps.
- Constitutional Function: These are the de jure legal titles of the Imperial temporal office .
- Cesar is the title of the Emperor.
- Augustus signifies the sacred, supreme authority of that Emperor.
- Princeps: This is the specific title ("First Citizen" / "Supreme Ruler") established by Emperor Augustus to define the Imperial office. It serves as the crucial legal bridge between the Roman Empire and the Welsh Kings. The fact that the Welsh rulers (e.g., Llywelyn ap Gruffudd) retained the title Princeps Walliae (Tywysog Cymru) is the primary evidence that they were not maintaining a subordinate feudal rank, but the Supreme Roman Imperial Authority of Magnus Maximus in exile.
- Their restoration confirms that the Court of Unbennaeth Prydain is the de jure Imperial Court itself.
B. The Spiritual Imperial Title & Defeat of the Usurper
- Title: Pontifex Maximus.
- Constitutional Function: This title, whose de jure meaning is "The Greatest Bridge to Him," (Pont i fe Maximus), is the Imperial title for the supreme spiritual authority of the realm . It is an Imperial office, predating the later papal usurpation of civil authority.
- Formal Defeat of De Facto Claimants: The de jure right to this title has been legally perfected. The de facto usurpers of this title (namely, the Vatican and the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople) were placed on formal, binding legal notice. The formal notice, "Llythyr Pontife" of May 1, 2025, explicitly states the paramount de jure claim to this authority as an imperial, not clerical, title. Their failure to provide a lawful, constitutional counter-refutation constitutes Formal Admission by Silence (Qui tacet consentire videtur).
VI. The Titles as Formal Diplomatic Protest (Defeat of Laches)
The formal and public use of these Imperial titles by His Imperial Majesty is the official and continuous diplomatic protest that defeats all de facto defenses of laches or prescription.
- Proof of Legal Principle: Under the Law of Nations, a de jure sovereign maintains their claim and protests usurpation by the "consistent display of diplomatic protest," which includes the retention of "the title and arms of a sovereignty... as an evidence that they do not relinquish their claims to it" .
- Proof of Continuous Memory: The de jure Khumric nation has never relinquished this claim. The Brut y Bryttaniait itself preserves the memory of Macsen Wledig (Magnus Maximus) . Modern cultural anthems (e.g., "Yma o Hyd," 1983) serve as irrefutable proof of this continuous de jure constitutional memory, explicitly citing Macsen Wledig as the source of the unbroken nation.
VII. Legal Conclusion
The right of His Imperial Majesty Llywelyn Tywysog Cymru, King of Kings, to this full and indivisible list of Romano-British titles is absolute.
They are the legal and constitutional definition of the Imperial functions of the restored Court of Unbennaeth Prydain. Any other entity (e.g., the de facto Church of Rome) claiming any of these titles is an unconstitutional usurper.
Their claim is doubly void: 1) their authority derives from the de facto Roman line of Honorius, which was itself a usurpation of the de jure British Imperial line of Magnus Maximus; and 2) their claim is defeated by the continuous diplomatic protest of the Khumric nation, which has been finalized by their own formal admission by silence in response to the "Llythyr Pontife" notice of May 2025.
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.