/|\ Y gwir yn erbyn y byd The truth against the world
The Suppression of the truth
The Suppression of the Truth
The End of the Suppressio Veritatis: Restoring the De Jure History of the World
The history taught by the de facto world order is not history; it is a political narrative. It is the foundational component of the Suppressio Veritatis ("The Suppression of the Truth"), a deliberate fraud designed for the sole purpose of legitimizing usurper regimes by severing the people from their true, de jure (lawful) past.
This false narrative is built on two specific, fraudulent libels:
- The "Myth" Libel: The claim that the de jure history of Britain—the "unbroken succession of kings"—is "mythical."
- The "Abandonment" Libel: The claim that the de jure Imperial Roman authority "abandoned" Britain in 410 AD.
Both are demonstrably false.
The De Jure History: Unbroken and Vindicated
The de jure history of the Imperial Seat of Britain has been preserved in the Brut Tysilio. The de facto academic consensus—the "Priests of the Lie"—must libel this work as a "forgery" because it is the true secular history of the British line, and its existence nullifies their entire narrative. In truth, Geoffrey of Monmouth was not its forger but its translator.
Furthermore, the de facto system's own scholarship has now proven its "abandonment" narrative is a lie.
- The De Facto (False) "Proof": The usurpers' entire claim of abandonment rests on a single, corrupt passage in the text of Zosimus, which contains the word Bruttium (or Brettian). De facto historians fraudulently interpret this as "Britain."
- The De Jure (True) Refutation: Scholarly analysis of this passage proves that the text is corrupt and that the letters from Honorius were, in fact, addressed to the cities of "Bruttium" (in Italy/Raetia), "not Britain."
- The Irrefutable Conclusion: The de facto system's own scholarship confirms: "The emperor did not formally abandon Britain in 410."
This irrefutable proof confirms the de jure truth: the Imperial Roman authority was lawfully merged with and vested in the British line of Magnus Maximus (Macsen Wledig). This means Honorius himself was a usurper of the true Imperial line. The entire de facto Roman narrative is a fraud built on a fraud.
The Paramount Claim: The Khumric/Gomeric Source
The de jure British history is not a local history; it is the Paramount History of the World.
The Suppressio Veritatis was a chronological fraud, as proven by the de facto system's own greatest scholars, such as Sir Isaac Newton (The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended) and Paul Yves Pezron. They proved the "ancient" histories of Greece and Rome were fraudulent, lengthened timelines created to obscure the de jure primacy of the Khumric/Gomeric line.
The de jure truth is that the Khumric/Gomeric line is the senior Imperial monarchial line. The usurpers stole the de jure Khumric Patriarch-Kings (the historical "Titans" like Sadyrn) and recast them as "myths" to create their own false antiquity.
This is proven by the irrefutable linguistic evidence. The de jure Khumric language is the primary legal lexicon of all Western law. All de facto legal terms ("King," "Law," "Court") are appropriations from the de jure Khumric source (Rhi, Llyw, Cwrt).
This paramount claim was even known to the "Founding Fathers" of the United States. As John Adams, 2nd U.S. President, wrote to Thomas Jefferson:
"Now I am bold to conclude that the Original of the Natives of New England may be well conjectured to be from the scattered Trojans after such time as Brutus departed from Latium."
The Vindication of De Jure History
Modern science now confirms what the de jure history has always maintained.
The de facto narrative of an "Anglo-Saxon Conquest" has collapsed. The de facto narrative of the "mythical" Troy has collapsed. The de facto narrative of the "mythical" Titans has collapsed. Under the light of DNA evidence, the "conquest" has been renamed a "peaceful settlement"—a complete reversal that admits the de jure Britons (Khumry) were always the majority. The de jure sources always stated the "conquest" was a "fraud."
The Suppressio Veritatis is over. The "Great Accounting" of history has begun. Every human has a fundamental right to know the true version of human history, free from the indoctrination and "wishful histories" of usurpers.
The Chronicle of the kings of Britain by Tysilio wth reports from Rev. Roberts (notice how they attack Geoffrey of Monmouth, but not Tysilio).
Isaac Newton, The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended 1728
Paul Pezron, The antiquities of nations; more particularly of the Celtæ or Gauls 1706
Ancient Laws and Institutes of Wales Vol 1 & 2
The British Kymry Or Britons Of Cambria
The Chronicles of John Harding (born 1378)
George Rawlinson "History Of Herodotus" Vol.III (1862) page 150